Talk:Paramatman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paramatman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hinduism: Philosophy Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Vaishnavism#Vaishnava sampradayas|Vaishnava sects]] The anchor (Vaishnava sampradayas) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Does the Rigveda really mention paramatman? Mitsube (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advaita & Paramatman

If the Jivatman and the Paramatman are known to be one and the same than how can can the word "Paramatman" conjure the concept of God in a monotheistic sense ? does the monotheistic religions consider God & the individuals to be one & the same ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.1.130 (talk) 11:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm placing the controversial sentence on this page until some sort of resolution is reached to this now year-long (August 2009-August 2010) NPOV dispute. In my view, this sentence might be true but contains too many weasel words to be clear enough to remain on the page, namely, "invariably," which is not cited, "God in a monotheistic sense," as Brahman is not the Christian God, and Hinduism is not a monotheistic religion, and especially the phrasing of, "may be applied as epithets," which is not only vague but also does not fit with the rest of the page as it loses any distinction between any of the, "Gods worshiped by Hindus." Perhaps someone will come along to incorporate this idea somehow, later on. Here's the removed sentence,

"The word invariably conjures the concept of an infinite, non-corporeal God in a monotheistic sense, even though Bhagavan or Ishvara may be applied as epithets to many divine forms of God worshiped by Hindus." makeswell (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Paramatman in Buddhism": There is none as far as I know, and link does not mention paramatman, simply the anatta belief. The sentence under the heading appears to be an original thought by the author, an attempt to speculate what Buddhisms implies. Unless some link to Buddhism can be shown, the section should be removed. BD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.40.192 (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Paramatman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312211826/http://vedabase.net/bg/13/23/en to http://vedabase.net/bg/13/23/en
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312212902/http://vedabase.net/sb/7/14/38/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/7/14/38/en
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217121958/http://vedabase.net/sb/3/28/41/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/3/28/41/en
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123213949/http://vedabase.net/sb/1/2/23/en to http://vedabase.net/sb/1/2/23/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]