Talk:ParaView

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing: Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Log of Changes

The article has been tagged since June 2007 as possibly not satisfying the notability guidelines. Since then, independent articles have described how Paraview made a particular job possible. The guidelines appear to refer to Biographies, Books, Companies, Fiction, Music, Neologisms, Numbers, Web content, or several proposals for new guidelines, none of which refer to software. A Google search for applications that perform a similar job to Paraview found very little, but found many links from a number of universities to Paraview. This suggests that Paraview fulfils an important role for which there is no substitute. I propose the notability tag be removed as notability has now been established. --Cameron.walsh 04:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LuisIbanez (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC) (Disclaimer: Kitware employee since 2002). In an effort to improve the notability of the ParaView article, I have added several references to uses of ParaView at research institutions in different countries. I also took away the notability tag after adding these references to secondary sources.[reply]

Features section

Something seems fishy about the "Features" section. It reads like a ParaView developer wrote it for a business client, including use of the word "we". There are barely any citations as well. Should this be removed despite potentially containing useful info? Elijah (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"ParaView in use" ― Should university courses be included?

The section "ParaView in use" includes some mentions of academic institution courses that use ParaView.

Is this really worth mentioning here? 196.128.20.33 (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]