Talk:Papoose

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep after rewrite.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page

See the talk section for papoose on User_talk:Gravediggah. Thank you -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 07:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qualifications for listing

I would appreciate it if any contributor to this article could list which of the following Criteria for listing this page meets.

A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, hip hop crew, dj etc) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

Has had a charted hit on any national music chart, in at least one large or medium-sized country*
Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one large or medium-sized country.
Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour over notable musical venues in at least one large or medium-sized country*, reported in notable and verifiable sources.
Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
Has been prominently featured in any major music media.

- - Meets. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 08:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise extremely notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.
Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
Has won a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno or Mercury Music Award.
Has won or placed a major music competition.

- - Meets Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 08:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that page.)
Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
Has been the subject of a half hour or hour broadcast on a national radio network.

As it's a musician page it is required to meet the WP:Music requirements. If it does not then it qualifies for deletion. Sorry for being so sticky about this. Thank you. -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 07:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Meets quite comfortably actually. I know its hard to research since Papoose is such a common name, and Google is a bit hard to use in this case, but he does in fact meet the criteria very easily. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 08:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is the word "mean" missing?

Resolved

The phrase "the term papoose is used to a child carrier" in the article read "the term papoose is used to mean a child carrier" ??? Daqu 05:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. Though in the future, you're welcome fix these yourself! Feel free to be bold. :) --El on ka 18:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hardy har har har.

Currently "The Boyz in the Hood" redirects here. Yes, I suppose I should remember to type 'n' for the Easy E song... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.61.139 (talk) 06:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Papoose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071205140348/http://www.amazon.com:80/Papoose-Carrier-Ivory-Straps-Reverse/dp/B000NGYDTA to http://www.amazon.com/Papoose-Carrier-Ivory-Straps-Reverse/dp/B000NGYDTA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Papoose in Peru'

Papoose in Cusco, Peru

I've just removed the above image and caption from the article. The style of dress seems to support that it depicts an indigenous Peruvian woman and child, as opposed to the rather unlikely alternative of an Algonquin woman who merely happens to be in Peru. Thus, whether the caption is meant to refer to the child or the child carrier, it would seem to be exactly the type of offensive usage described earlier in the article, and wholly inappropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Unless I've grossly misunderstood something the image itself needs a more appropriate caption on Wikipedia/Wikimedia as well, or more likely to be removed outright if it cannot be contextualized with some legitimate description (it is no longer in use on any pages since I removed it here), but unfortunately I'm unfamiliar with the process for doing so.

Walkersam (talk) 03:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pappoos" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pappoos has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Pappoos until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]