Talk:Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) is part of the The Fame series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 16, 2010	Good article reassessment	Not listed
March 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 17, 2010	Good article reassessment	Kept
April 30, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 31, 2014	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Lady Gaga High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lady Gaga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lady Gaga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lady GagaWikipedia:WikiProject Lady GagaTemplate:WikiProject Lady GagaLady Gaga articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chord Progression... Again

What the... Hell is this:

"Cm–A♭–C–N–C"

Since when do we have an "N-chord", or even a note? Please, someone fix this, this is absolutely ridiculous and incorrect, shouldn't take place at Wikipedia, let alone in the case of such a major song/artist/article. Thanks. My.life.is.muzik... (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paparazzi No.1 on Billboard Radio Songs

Paparazzi was lady GaGa first song on the top of Billboard Radio Songs i think it was in late 2009,but if you don't believe me,go look at official billboard radio songs chart in 2009 and see,Please change that on charts section,Thank's :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.178.214.82 (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to WP:USCHARTS. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Video screencap up for deletion

The video screen capture from this article is up for deletion as failing WP:NFCC #8. Please see Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2014_November_19#Lady_Gaga_vidcaps for details. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.fimi.it/dett_ddmercato.php?id=47
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mephEecf?url=http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/delta-goodrems-talents-top-the-charts/story-e6frfn09-1225816830674 to http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/delta-goodrems-talents-top-the-charts/story-e6frfn09-1225816830674

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MTV VMA Photo

I noticed that there are pictures uploaded from Gaga's VMA performance of 'Applause'. (File:Lady Gaga Applause MTV VMA 2013 4.jpg) I am not sure if they are properly licensed and really allowed to be used, but if they are, could someone upload a photo of her VMA performance of 'Paparazzi' in 2009? That's still one of her most well-known Awards show performances. It garnered a bunch of reviews, and it would really elevate this article. --188.156.2.232 (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sricsi, they are properly licensed pictures. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news, then. :) --Sricsi (talk) 21:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single release date inconsistency - May 29 or July 6?

This is taken from the start of the second paragraph on this page:

'The single was released on May 29, 2009, through the music video. On July 6, 2009, it was released digitally in Ireland and the United Kingdom and four days later physically in Australia.'

The infobox on this page shows the digital UK and Irish release date, however on the page for The Fame, the music video date is listed instead. It does say that 'the single was released on May 29, 2009, through music video', so shouldn't that date be the one put on the infobox? The MTV source on the music video section about the video getting leaked even calls it Lady Gaga's 'latest single'. 84.66.14.150 (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]