Talk:Panzer II variants
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panzer II variants redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because the source is clearly cited, unlike the original which had no citations. A split off variants section is the norm for large numbers of variants with large sections. As for no discussion, there is no need for discussion for obvious improvements!!--Petebutt (talk) 12:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- It may be referenced, but what advantage does splitting the article give?
- There is a stronger argument for splitting off the SPGs (although there is no content sufficient to justify this). Splitting off though the tank variants, as you have done here, simply makes the main article unreadable. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Redirect-Class Germany articles
- Mid-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles