The contents of the Panorama (art) page were merged into Panoramic painting on 19 August 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panorama (art) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect was accepted on 2 June 2010 by reviewer Chzz (talk·contribs).
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
A lot of potentially misplaced focus on Wordsworth
This article has a very specific section on Wordsworth's opinion of panoramas, most of which is repeated in a separate article called Romantic-era panoramas, and I'm not clear on whether the information even belongs in either article. It's as if someone is regurgitating the more salient points of their phd thesis here. If a reader is truly interested in a detailed and well-referenced discussion Wordsworth's opinion of panoramas (??), perhaps it's better suited to the page on Wordsworth? Or, if it's that important and interesting (and clearly to me, it's not), an entirely separate page called "What Wordsworth Thinks of Panoramas"?
