Talk:Pancha Tattva (Vaishnavism)

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Hinduism: Krishnaism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Low-importance).

The Five Features

Neti - neti and Saguna Brahman etc are Mayavadic concepts which are removed. Could someone expand this section with Gaudiya views please?

Tharikrish 09:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

harekrsna.com

I have deleted a link to harekrsna.com. the site knowingly and persistently bootlegs book-length copyrighted text.

At <harekrsna.com/philosophy/acarya/writings.htm> (prefix that with "www") you will find more than 50 volumes of copyrighted books the site has no right to publish.

Further information is available from the rights and permissions department of the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, www.bbt.info.

The relevant Wikipedia policy appears in Wikipedia:Copyrights, in Section 4.3, "Linking to copyrighted works."

O Govinda 19:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange

I've always heard the word in the context of the five elements: Vayu, Agni, Akasha, Prithvi and Jala. It remains to be seen how notable is this interpretation of this article, but in any case, the mainstream view should at least exist on this page. deeptrivia (talk) 01:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

do you mean 'Pancha' (five) or 'Pancha Tattva'? In this context the meaning does not refer to the five elements. The five personalities are regarded as the five aspects of the Absolute Truth in Gaudiya Vaishnava philosophy. If the phrase Panca Tattva is also used to describe the five elements then I'd suggest a disambiguation link at the start. GourangaUK 16:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I understand that. The question is how notable "this context" is? The word panchatattva is very widely used. In a google search, I did find the descriptions that match this article, but they were all related to ISKCON/Hare Krishna. I am not sure why they decided to use this very common Hindi/Sanskrit word to mean "personalities" or "Truth", because literally it does mean element ([1]). Mainstream Sanskrit and Hindi literature uses this word exclusively to mean "five elements" (see examples). deeptrivia (talk) 01:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deeptrivia, the term has been used, at least in Gaudiya Vaishnavism for the past 500 years. Tattva is used to exstensively in the Puranas to denote a type of 'truth' or 'form' (as in Vishnu-tattva, jiva-tattva etc...), so I'm assuming it was a simple case of putting the number 5 before it. See tattva for examples. Regards, GourangaUK 08:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about the term being used in Gaudiya Vaishnavism to denote essence of truth, as the vedabase (Copyright Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International) link suggests. But the question is how many people follow this sect. Of the order of a million, ten million, or perhaps even a hundred million (highly doubtable)? There are a billion Hindus. I find the Gaudiya Vaishnava interpretation very interesting, and can easily appreciate how it fits into their philosophy. However, the mainstream interpretation is different: e.g., death has since ancient times as a person's submergence into panchatattva (the body is made of panchatattva (earth, water, etc.), into which it disappears after death. deeptrivia (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say it so much a case of different interpretations, as a case of the same words being used to describe two totally different things at different times by different cultures. There may be a billion 'Hindus' but as Hinduism itself is such a mix of diverse sub-cultures I wouldn't have thought there was a strongly identifiable mainstream as such? Ys, GourangaUK 15:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mahābhūta

Any details regarding Ganachakra and Panchamakara are of much greater relevance within the Mahābhūta article and thus I have removed the information (which consisted largely of a quotation) from this article. Regards, Gouranga(UK) 09:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well populate those articles to which you make reference instead of removing content that is valid and informing and directly relevant to this Sanskrit term. Stop being a Vaishnava separatist.

B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 09:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to move the information across - it is not relevant in this context. Gouranga(UK) 09:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pancha Tattva (Vaishnavism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312212946/http://vedabase.net/cc/adi/1/14/en to http://vedabase.net/cc/adi/1/14/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]