Talk:Palestine Exploration Fund

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Source

Source for first 21 years

Hi Oncenawhile, see this: [1]. Zero^talk 22:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Volumes and issues

To editor Arminden: The number of issues of PEQ was a bit irregular right at the beginning. Some reports from 1865 are called Volume 1 and 7 issues published in 1869 are called Volume 2. Nothing in 1870. From 1871 to 1941: 4 issues. From 1942 to 2006: 2 issues. From 2007 to 2012: 3 issues. From 2013 to now: 4 issues. I think this is too much detail for the article, though I'm wondering if the journal should have its own article. Many less important journals have articles. Zero^talk 03:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Zero0000: Thanks. Why am I not surprised that you have the answers :)) Of course, an article would be very welcome, if this epidemic stays on for as long as it seems likely, we'll have a perfect, exhaustive and shiny Wikipedia at the end of it. Take care, Arminden (talk) 11:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]