Talk:Palaeophasianus
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
BioLib gives author and year incorrectly
[edit]Biolib: https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id475444/ gives an orthographic variant of the name ("Paleophasianus") and the author as "Wetmore, 1940" ("Check list of fossil birds", p.45. Their entry is incorrect and I have notified the biolib database (and corrected the Ukrainian article to reflect the other databases now listed in the taxonbar). MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- Wikipedia requested images of birds
- WikiProject Birds articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles