Talk:Pakistan Marines

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / Asian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Archives

Archive 1

Infobox image

The article says Despite of its close association with the Pakistan Navy, the Pakistan Marines shares the same military ranks and military codes as of the Pakistan Army. So the infobox image show an officer described as Captain Uzair Khalid which appears to be a naval rank. More confusion the rank braid appears to be that of a Lieutenant. MilborneOne (talk) 07:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That Image doesn't exist now ....--Maxx786 (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Two notes however: Firstly, the appeal to official names is not all that relevant in terms of article naming policy. Secondly, there have been many cut-and-paste move attempts, both to this talk page and the article. The article seems OK, but I've moved the target talk page to Talk:Pakistan Marines/Archive 1 just to be sure we don't lose anything significant, particularly from its history. Possibly unnecessary but harmless. Andrewa (talk) 09:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani Marines → Pakistan Marines – This page was moved by a user from the real name Pakistan Marines some years back..But the official name is Pakistan Marines as in 1, 2 and 3 Maxx786 (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move I support the move, it should be restored to its original title as per the references. Faizan -Let's talk! 10:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move. The name is also in accordance with the title of the Pakistan Armed Forces. Mar4d (talk) 13:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pakistan Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120627040148/http://www.paknavy.gov.pk:80/qasim.htm to http://www.paknavy.gov.pk/qasim.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Organization

I just removed[1] some content because it appeared to have copied a globalsecurity.org page. 39.33.116.124 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strength

100,000? There would be more marines than the entire navy, on 11 Mar 2019, I reduced to 10,000, a much more believable number. Although, with the proliferation of Pakistani security forces 100,000 could be possible.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 12:41, 13 March 2019‎ User:Pranav21391 did this "(Pakistan Navy page lists 5000 personnel. Which one is correct? 100,000 is a huge number - References?)"--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
on 3/5/2020 the Infobox states 75,650.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 11;07, 8 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.77.202 (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Myanmar Army personal undergoing training in Pakistan together with Pak Soldiers and Marines.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]