Talk:Pacific Wings

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Hawaii Mid‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Headquarters, 5950 Berkshire Lane, Suite 800 Dallas TX 75225-5836 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that an image or photograph of Former headquarters, Kahului Airport Commuter Terminal 1 Kahului Airport Road Kahului, HI 96732 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Hawaii may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Since the Airport Security Incidents is a recent event, suggesting that the article either get a banner detailing it's a recent event. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.234.99.65 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC-7)

NPOV Problem

The whole convoluted section regarding the various security incidents at Pacific Wings appears to be heavily slanted in favor of Pacific Wings - much more so than the local Hawaii newspaper articles that are linked to as sources for the claims show. In fact, I'll be willing to bet that this entire section was personally written and edited by Gabriel Kimbrell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.0.171 (talk) 00:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I k=just googled several articles as well as the federal indictment and superceeding indictment, and this guy Tam Ho is facing something like 50 years. Nobody at the airline wrote that, it was a federal grand jury. All the other statements the post can be independently confirmed by published newspaper reports and court documents. Is this really "slanted" or do you have a beef with those people. The Grand Jury indictment is pretty scary, and the key witness was a Wackenhut employee who spilled the beans to federal prosecutors. It looks like the victims didn't even testify. The whole case seems to be based on incriminating statements by Tam Ho's own employees. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't mean they are slanted or untrue. What will you say if the guy goes up for 15-25 years? Is the jury slanted? 24.183.203.17 (talk) 04:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the first commenter is suffering to the alleged baiting of Wackenhut guards and others by Pacific Wings employees. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.231.120 (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To get rid of the neutrality tag, there needs to be something documented on what motive may have caused this action by Wackenhut. Otherwise, I would reduce this section to the bare minimum - one or two sentences max.Tiktok4321 (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet size

84.157.86.77 added the following to the Fleet section of the article:

Beside that press release from starbulletin mentioned under ⁽⁵⁾, other reliable sources show only five
Cessna 208B Grand Caravan aircraft, with registrations N301PW up to N305PW. Maybe that article messed
up with a previously owned Cessna 402C, which left alredy the fleet from pacific wings.

I reverted this edit because it was both unsourced (it states "other reliable sources" without citing any) and rather speculative, guessing that the Star-Bulletin made an error. If a more recent reliable source can be cited with the current fleet size, then great and let's update the article. Certainly fleet plans change and we should keep up to date, let's do it without the speculation. -- Hawaiian717 18:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The contributor emailed me and we've had a little discussion. He's pointed me to a more recent reliable source and I've updated the article to reflect a fleet of 5 Grand Caravans. -- Hawaiian717 18:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]