Talk:Pacific Proving Grounds
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pacific Proving Grounds article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Pacific Proving Grounds appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 August 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WPMILHIST Assessment
[edit]contaminated
[edit]Comes 80.177.49.33 to say "contaminated NOT decontaminated", and corrects the sentence to say:
- "The "Baker" shot created a large condensation cloud and spread much more radioactive water onto the ships than was expected; many of the surviving ships became too "hot" to be used or contaminated and eventually had to be sunk."
The sense of the sentence is that the ships had become too contaminated to be used and too contaminated to be decontaminated (which process involves human work on the vessel), and they were therefore sunk, after various other ideas failed to remedy the situation. That is the correct sense of the sentence. SkoreKeep (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles