Talk:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
Advertisement?
[edit]I didn't read this thoroughly, but I was tempted to slap an {{advert}} tag on it. It's pretty neutrally worded, but still strikes me as a bit propagandistic. I might be biased. But it's hard to tell how neutral this is without any citations of reliable sources... Katr67 23:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
As other editors have noted both above and with the {{advertisement}} tag on the article, the article read more like a public relations release than a neutral encyclopedia article. I have begun to remove the promotional language.
- To begin with I deleted the peacock language of the infobox “Field of Research” parameter: “PNNL delivers leadership and advancements”.
- I removed the entire “Missions and Core Capabilities” section because it was hopelessly promotional and would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. A mission statement is useful as advertising and for internal focus, but it is inherently unencyclopedic. Perhaps there is something salvageable in the section, but I can’t identify it. (And although I expect it to be deleted, I moved the holograph image for now to another place.)
Other sections that need attention:
- In the “Notable scientists” section: The paragraphs on Laboratory Fellows and Battelle Fellows are meaningful to PNNL employees, but these recognitions are not notable for our general audience. If the section is to be retained, the paragraph on external awards should perhaps be expanded, naming names and achievements.
- I am not sure what the point is in the point is in the list of PNNL directors. (I assume that Ron Paul, Tommy Ambrose, and Leonard Peters are not the same people that have articles.) —teb728 t c 08:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Updates and Corrections of Factual Errors
[edit]Hello! I am an employee of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and I have been reviewing our Wikipedia page for accuracy. Since the page has not been updated in several years, I was wondering how I should go about making the necessary corrections and updates. Could you help me with this? I want to be sure that I comply with Wikipedia editorial guidelines. Thank you! PRunci (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class glass articles
- Mid-importance glass articles
- C-Class glass articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Glass articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class energy articles
- Unknown-importance energy articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Eastern Washington task force articles
- Low-importance Eastern Washington task force articles
- Eastern Washington task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles