Talk:PS20 solar power plant
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PS20 solar power plant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Map
[edit]The location on the map is wrong. It is not even on Spanish territory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasconde (talk • contribs) 11:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Not totaly true
[edit]"It was designed by Abener and EPG Gliwice. The mirrors were delivered by Abengoa, and the Solar Tower was designed and built by ALTAC, another Spanish Engineering and Construction Company."
- - Solar towers are designed by Abener
- - Solar Tower PS-10 was constructed by ALTAC
- - Solar Tower PS-20 was constructed by Editesa
--Takashi kurita (talk) 15:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Eureka5?
[edit]Need some information on the Eureka5 tower supposedly shown in the photo... any add a citation? Jdpipe (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
PS10 PS20 relative sizes
[edit]The picture used in the PS10 and PS20 articles is unfortunate. It is good to have them both in one photo, but the pic distorts the relative sizes. PS20 produces about twice as much power, but looks to be no larger in the picture. The PS20 collection field is actually larger, as can be seen in these better photos:
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalglobe-imagery/4534817107/
- http://www.thenewecologist.com/2010/06/ps10-and-ps20-are-the-road-openers-for-solar-energy-mass-production/
- http://www.solarpaces.org/Tasks/Task1/ps10.htm
- http://www.spanishnews.es/20090428-abengoa-solar-puts-its-ps20-solar-tower-into-operation/id=352/
-96.237.79.6 (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:PS10 solar power tower which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 12:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.power-technology.com/projects/Seville-Solar-Tower/
- Triggered by
\bpower-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on PS20 solar power plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090618073353/http://sev.prnewswire.com/oil-energy/20090427/DC0579027042009-1.html to http://sev.prnewswire.com/oil-energy/20090427/DC0579027042009-1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811230017/http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/sectors/doc/csp/ps10_final_report.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/sectors/doc/csp/ps10_final_report.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210152851/http://www.solarpaces.org/Tasks/Task1/ps10.htm to http://www.solarpaces.org/Tasks/Task1/PS10.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)