Talk:PRINCE2/Archives/2014
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Comparison with other project management techniques
I'd be interested in summaries of reliable sources that compare this project management technique to the PMI body of knowledge, TOC/Critical Chain, etc. VisitorTalk 05:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I have edited this section because it was saying that both PMP and PRINCE2 are methodologies. However, this is unacceptable, since PMP is a certification - not a methodology - which assesses knowledge in PM best practices and experience while PRINCE2 assesses the knowledge related to the methodology. That difference can be found in several websites, including APM. I would suggest to add a lot more content to this section, what I can help to do in the future. Meanwhile, I ask for help in regards to the references. I added a reference to a section of the PMI website, but I couldn't add the name of the webpage. My apologies, because I am still junior in editing Wikipedia. Carlos.serra (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncritical Wikipedia Entry
The main article reads like an advertisement for Prince2.
Is there any non-subjective, solid empirical or statistical evidence that Prince2 improves project management in any way at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.233.244 (talk) 13:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)