Talk:POS Solutions

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal POS Solutions is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

While trying to establish notability of the company after the author user:Zprogrammer keeps removing the {{notability}} without improving the article, I came across the blog of a competitor. Obviously this needs to be taken with caution, but at least it indicates that some of the claims need better independent sources, to decide, who of the two is right. In particular the issue of market leadership as well as the number of customers need reliable quotes. The source given in the article for market leadership, the National Newsagents 2005 yearbook, is not on the given web site. --S.K. 16:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted sources

Just for transparency: a 2010 source from the Epoch Times at [1] (Sydney's Weekend Edition 28 August 2010) had been removed. While the source and its statistics are quite dated and in Chinese, maybe some of its info is still useful (archived versions seem to exist on the Internet Archive, but it would need a Chinese reader to research them). For other sources that have been previously deleted, see earlier versions in the article history. GermanJoe (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{refimprove}}

Deleted sources