Talk:P. Kodanda Rao/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history)ย ยท Article talk (edit | history)ย ยท Watch
Reviewer: DreamRimmerย (talk ยท contribs) 17:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this one for you. Expect comments within a few days. ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 17:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- At first glance, I haven't seen anything amiss and am double-checking all of the additional points. ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 12:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Career
[edit]In second paragraph's second line, please change He accompanied Sastri to the Round Table Conferences in London and in South Africa. to He accompanied Sastri to the Round Table Conferences in London and South Africa.
(or simply remove the in from South Africa)
ย Done
In second paragraph's fourth line, please change He was also the member of the Indian delegation to the Round Table Conferences between India and South Africa in 1926 and 1932. to He was also a member of the Indian delegation to theย Round Table Conferencesย between India and South Africa in 1926 and 1932.
(or simply alt the article with a)
ย Done
In third paragraph's last line, please change In one of those letters Gandhi clarified the role of Henry David Thoreau in shaping Gandhi's views on Civil resistance. to In one of those letters, Gandhi clarified the role ofย Henry David Thoreau in shaping his views onย Civil resistance.
ย Done
The fourth paragraph of the career section had some grammar issues, so I fixed some. Please check, and if everything is okay, then replace it with the below paragraph.
Rao wrote extensively in various journals on topics relating to Indians overseas, emigration, and immigration, and Indian politics under British Rule. Writing in The New York Timesย in 1935, he decried theย Government of India Act 1935 as limiting and preventing the country from moving towards freedom and a dominion status.ย He also wrote books includingย East vs West: Denial of Contrast,ย Culture Conflicts: Cause and Cure, andย Foreign Friends of India's Freedom. Rao's book, Foreign Friends of India's Freedom, was a collection of broadcasts commissioned by the All India Radioย on the 25th anniversary of India's independence.ย Rao was the recipient of theย Sangeet Natak Akademi Awardย in 1963.
ย Done
Why are there double and in the following paragraph? If it was left by mistake, then it should be corrected.
Rao wrote extensively in various journals on topics relating to Indians overseas, emigration, and immigration, and Indian politics under the British Rule.
ย Done
In the last paragraph of the career section: Please replace Rao also served on various governmental committees including serving on the Madhya Pradesh Prohibition Enquiry Committee (1951) set up by the Government of Madhya Pradesh. with Rao also served on various governmental committees, including the Madhya Pradesh Prohibition Enquiry Committee (1951), set up by the Government of Madhya Pradesh.
ย Done. Thanks for the very detailed notes. Have covered all of them, I think. Ktin (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Personal life
[edit]First paragraph's last line read: He also dedicated his book Foreign friends of India's freedom to his wife.
Please add a comma after First paragraph's last line read: He also dedicated his book
ย Done
Please fix book name: Foreign friends of India's freedom to Foreign Friends of India's Freedom
ย Done
Published works
[edit]Checked. all okay.
References
[edit]References checked by me (see data below)
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked โย Fail Heuristics resolved as likely dead (Please replace with reliable sources; if the issue is temporary, then no changes are needed.)
- Might have been temporary? Have added an archive link - please have a look. Ktin (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked โย Fail Connection failed or remote server error (Please replace with reliable sources; if the issue is temporary, then no changes are needed.)
- Might have been temporary? Have added an archive link - please have a look. Ktin (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
- Reliable/Statement covered: checked
GA review โ see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- pass
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living personsโscience-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- no issues
- C. It contains no original research:
- checked, no issues.
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- checked, Both a manual spot check and a copyvio detector encountered nothing.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- checked, no issues.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- focused on the topic, pass
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Pass, no issues.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- checked, no edit-wars.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- no issues, pass
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- checked, no issues.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- @DreamRimmer: Many thanks for this very thoughtful review. I will work on this in the next couple of days, and will share an update. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer thanks for your patience. I think I have addressed the feedback. Please have a look and let me know if I can help with any additional edits. Ktin (talk) 01:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Excellent work @Ktin, promoting it as GA. ๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 05:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)