Talk:P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This is how the article, as of July 15, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Good here, but major problems are in the lead section. It reads almost word for word with the Recording section. The lead should be a summary, and shouldn't pull so heavily from the main text. For example, it needn't be mentioned in the lead section that LaToya and Janet were in the guise of PYTs.

2. Factually accurate?: Very well referenced. Good job here.

3. Broad in coverage?: Pretty thorough. I would only say that maybe some more reviews for the 2008 version would be nice.

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

I'm going to pass this. But the lead issue and the reviews need to addressed if this is to become a featured article. Thank you for your work so far.— Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely work on your concerns. Thanks for the review! Pyrrhus16 14:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]