Talk:Oxford University Museum of Natural History
A fact from Oxford University Museum of Natural History appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is something wrong with the dating on this article.
The building date is given as 1861, but of course the Wilberforce-Huxley evolution debate took place in the museum in 1860!
Worse yet, in one section we are told within a couple of lines that the debate itself occurred in both 1860 AND 1861.
Could someone please check up on the ACTUAL date of construction and make the necessary corrections. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.180.60 (talk) 09:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
The building was built between 1855 and 1860. It is likely that some finish work was continuing on the building when the Wilberforce-Huxley debate occurred, but it must have been sufficiently complete to house the debate. Henry Acland says at the beginning of his preface (dated June 15, 1860) to the second edition of The Oxford Museum (London: George Allen, 1893) that "The Oxford Museum slowly approaches completion." The Wilberforce-Huxley debate occurred on June 30, 1860. I have made corresponding changes to the article.71.171.31.38 (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
"Convocation" or "Congregation"
[edit]As far as I can determine, in the mid-19th century, the governing body of Oxford University was "Convocation." This article previously referred to the ruling body as "Congregation." I have made corresponding changes to the text of the article. 71.171.31.38 (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oxford University Museum of Natural History. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081208062457/http://www.earth.ox.ac.uk/people/profiles/academic/jimk to http://www.earth.ox.ac.uk/people/profiles/academic/jimk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deliverance?
[edit]Regarding the 1860 evolution debate, this page says (without citation):
Wilberforce is purported to have turned to his neighbour, chemist Professor Brodie and exclaiming, "The Lord has delivered him into mine hands."
However, the page dedicated to the debates says (with two citations):
According to a letter written 30 years later to Francis Darwin, when Huxley heard this he whispered to Brodie, "The Lord hath delivered him into mine hands".
Which is correct? – Ministry (talk) 20:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class University of Oxford articles
- High-importance University of Oxford articles
- C-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Museums articles
- Low-importance Museums articles