Talk:Ouvrage Immerhof

Military history: Fortifications / European / French / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism, perpetrated in last year, nobody cares?

More or less coincendentally, i came to read this lemma, while trying to improve Wikidata through Mix 'n Match. At the first glance, immediately i saw that there was something wrong (later: that there were several things wrong), with inappropriate text. The first 2 words were "is cute", which is clearly not the naming and definition of the subject, that a Wikipedia lemma should start with.

Well, this can happen with the freely editing on Wikipedia and obvious mistakes and vandalism should be corrected very quickly on Wikipedia, so there should not be a real problem. No, wrong. This vandalism took place last year, more than seven monthes ago and nobody active on en-wp bothered to correct this. Meanwhile, those edits, from more than half a year ago, were made by an anomymous "contributor", which might warrant for some checking ... but no, this could just pass.

I find this very worrying ... --Paulbe (talk) 02:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]