Talk:Ouvrage Cap Martin

Military history: Fortifications / European / French / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in France may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Offensive heading removed

This guy keeps deleting a SOURCED part of the article. Why not preventing him and his asspain from doing so rather than preventing people from correcting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.219.228.220 (talk) 01:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One warning only: if I see any hint of a repetition of that edit summary or the abuse above, your IPs will be blocked on sight and the article indefinitely protected. Make your case for inclusion politely, or not at all. Acroterion (talk) 02:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That battle is a hoax and the related article was already deleted after a regular procedure (I can't find the exact title apparently). There is nothing to discuss: why the template of a battle should be in this article? --Enok (talk) 03:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Since we don't have many proofs and the only book who can prove the battle of pont saint-louis is clearly nationalist i think that stats about the battle should be removed for many reasons, one of these is that is an historic fake and basically the french soldiers shot unarmed soldiers who had the duty to communicate the armistice between the countries. FrançoisCristophe (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple sources in French and English discuss an action (or at least a standoff) at Pont Saint-Louis. Please provide reliable sources that it was a falsification, or that it did not happen according to historical accounts. Whether or not unarmed soldiers were shot doesn't negate the action. Acroterion (talk) 12:15, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Casemate du Pont Saint Louis

There was no french prisonners. The armistice of the 24 june 1940 was signed. 192.54.144.229 (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a source for the 9 prisoners though. Stickee (talk) 00:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It shows 8 French soldiers instead of 9 I am thinking there were prisioners or not

389 French casualties ?

According to this article, there were 389 French casualties for the sole battle of Pont Saint-Louis. However, according to the Italian invasion of France article, French casualties, for the whole battle of the Alps, were about : 40 killed, 50 wounded, 150 missing.

Which means there is clearly something wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.140.21.144 (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This figure is indeed wrong, it exceeds the largest estimation of French casualties during the whole Italian invasion of France (40 killed, 50-120 missing, 150 prisoners, 100-150 missing). See here. Until provided this a better source the figures from Michel Truttman should be preferred. Dyadique78 (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy In Officer Count

In the “history” section it says there were 11 officers, but in the “Ouvrage Cap Martin” area (to the right of the main text), it says the strength was 1 officer. I believe there may have been I typo but I am not sure which is correct. Please correct. руддщ глкфшту! (talk) 11:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]