Talk:Outline of the visual arts

Outlines High‑importance

	This article is an outline, a type of article that presents a list of articles or sub-topics related to its subject in a hierarchical form. For the standardized set of outlines on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines. Outlines are within the scope of WikiProject Outlines, a collaborative effort to improve outlines on Wikipedia. For guidance on building and maintaining outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.OutlinesWikipedia:WikiProject OutlinesTemplate:WikiProject OutlinesOutlines articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Art#Art forms|art forms]] The anchor (#Art forms) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Oh no. This structure does not look anything like a basic list of topics. There have been lists like this before that have been deleted. Please clearly define what basic topics you mean and don't try to re-create main articles or list everything in a category. 18:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

It takes about an hour to give a basic list a good start. How come you didn't develop the list? Is it because it is easier to get rid of something rather than make it better? The list has been expanded (it took about an hour), therefore the merge tag no longer applies, and has been removed. The Transhumanist 13:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to

See the proposal at the Village pump

The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for outlines

Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.

Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "History of" section needs links!

Please add some relevant links to the history section.

Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates. Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called

A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.

See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?

The Transhumanist 04:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Outline of art" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Outline of art. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Outline of art until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 July 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of the visual arts → Outline of art – Art most commonly refers to the visual arts. Outline of art already redirects here. There has been a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_13#Outline_of_art to change the redirect target that got rejected. I'm sure most readers will know what this is talking about. Interstellarity (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:CONPRIME. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Despite Interstellarity's rejected proposal to move it, Art was not renamed, and visual arts is what this outline is about, not art or all the other arts. I wish you'd stop trying to rename articles all the time, Interstellarity, and do something useful instead, like improving them. Johnbod (talk) 04:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visual art and art are different -- just because visual art is a type of art doesn't make them synonymous (and just because visual art is more popular than other forms of art doesn't make the terms synonymous). Art is broader and contains non-visual mediums, including Sound art, Olfactory art, Interactive art, Robotic art, New media art, etc. If you wanted to change the scope of this article and include the fields of non-visual artwork, then that could be a different discussion. But as the article stands, it is plainly about visual art, not artworks in general. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.