Talk:Our Country Deserves Better PAC

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Funding

I added the following to the article:

According to FEC filings, Our Country Deserves Better directed almost two thirds of its spending during July through November 2009 back to the Republican consulting firm that created the PAC in the first place. Of $1.33 million, a total of $857,122 went to Sacramento-based GOP political consulting firm Russo, Marsh, and Associates, or people associated with it.^[1]

Ikip 21:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Roth, Zachary (December 29, 2009). "Majority Of Tea Party Group's Spending Went To GOP Firm That Created It". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved 29 December 2009.

Neutrality?

The tour was focused around the "tea party" movement who opposes the out-of-control spending, socialized health care, and bailouts resulting from President Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress. -That all sounds pretty POV to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.36.179.66 (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Roth, Zachary (December 29, 2009). "Majority Of Tea Party Group's Spending Went To GOP Firm That Created It". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved 29 December 2009.

[1]