Talk:Otilia Choque/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SusunW (talk · contribs) 18:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well written article which seems to be in compliance with all GA criteria. I checked every reference which I could access and found only one discrepancy:

1 May Neighrhood Council? La Patria (2021) says “Junta Vecinal Sentec”, i.e. Sentec Neighborhood Council. I don’t see a reference in La Patria (2012), but Romero Ballivián says “junta de vecinos del barrio 1 de mayo”, i.e. the neighborhood council of the 1 May barrio. This seems to indicate that they are two different barrios?

Hi! Yeah, so, I think I see where the conflation between 1ro de Mayo and SENTEC originates from. Choque's government profile (in external links) appears to state that the two barrios share a council. I know for a fact that Salvador Romero's dictionary frequently draws from these profiles, and he probably just shortened the name from there. Per your and some other sources, they seem to be separate, so I went ahead and just replace "1 May" with "SENTEC". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking on it.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

Two sources are hosted on twitter, but appear to be from a printed schedule of the legislature rather than an uncurated user post.

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

As I have come to expect from you, Krisgabwoosh, a well written, easy to understand article. I appreciate your work. SusunW (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passing it now. Nice working with you again. SusunW (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.