Talk:Otero College/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Otero College. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Fair use rationale for Image:Otero Junior Collegelogo.jpg
Image:Otero Junior Collegelogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Merge of Koshare Indian Museum/Dancers
Neither Koshare Indian Museum nor Koshare Indian Dancers contain enough information/activity to warrant separate articles, so I propose summarizing their content in the existing section of this article.FriendlyFred (talk) 03:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose either merge, per WPScouting MOS, both meet threshold of notability requirements.Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Link rot, "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." Your removal of sourced content smacks of gaming the system to get the articles merged here.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)