Talk:Oslo City Hall

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lead image, infobox

This edit troubles me. I find it obvious that the lead image should be of the whole building, not of a part of one of the towers. Also, some of the information is misleading. The infobox is currently stating: "Client: Norwegian government, Owner: Norwegian Democratic Government". The latter phrase is awkward indeed. The city hall is owned and used by the City of Oslo, and using "Democratic" in this context is just weird. Regards, --Kjetil_r 16:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I will fix this + and probably upload a new image from Flickr with a better quality, (UTC)

and of course, in the creative commons category. The infobox information youve mentioned was simply a little html misplacement from my side. Hope you keep the article as it is when I have replaced the content just mentioned.

--Fiskepinner (talk) 09:43, 22 December 2009 Fixed --Fiskepinner (talk) 17:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Height

I've never been to Oslo, but are you sure that this building is 310 metres high???

I found a Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs web page that gives 66 m.

--Conte di Cavour (talk) 12:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

City Hall

In the description is written that the architecture style is Brutalist or Postmodern. But Postmodern is an idea started in the 1972, and also Brutalist is an architecture style born after the 1936.

This style is really similar to the Italian style in the same period, 1920-1940, we call that Fascist style, without any negative meaning of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniele1357 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Language

The English of this article is atrociously poor. Most, if not necessarily all, of the text appears to have been translated by a translating program, resulting in untranslated words and grossly mistranslated passages. The text should be revised forthwith. --Death Bredon (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oslo City Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718005339/http://www.ub.uib.no/elpub/2001/h/520001/Hovedoppgave.pdf to http://www.ub.uib.no/elpub/2001/h/520001/Hovedoppgave.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]