Talk:Osama bin Laden/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 19:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
I am quick failing the article on the basis that the nominator has not contributed to the article, in any shape or form. Other points of concern: the lead does not summarize the article sufficiently, there are a few deadlinks and two dablinks and has citation tags – see WP:Verifiability for more. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- This was an improper quick fail. This article doesn't meet any of the six criteria listed for a quick fail, listed here. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake, would have thought nominations made by non-contributors would have been in the criteria. Regardless, I stand by the fail and have replied on the nominator's talkpage for my reasons behind it. - Lemonade51 (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)