Talk:Oryzomys dimidiatus

Requested move

See Talk:Coues's Rice Rat. Ucucha 02:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Coues's Rice Rat which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 03:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments

(Copied from /Comments subpage. Ucucha 21:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC))

• Lack of photo is a stark issue for a species.
• The description paragraph has good info, but needs to be rewritten for easy reading and clarity - perhaps pare down measurements to most important info (ear and hindfoot are likely unneccessary), simplify dual measurements.
• Utilize {{convert}}
• Utilize {{cite book}} and {{cite journal}} to create more complete refs.
• More explanatory descriptions in prose, e.g.:
  • "The first known specimen was obtained by W. G. Palmer on 5 November 1904 on the Río Escondido near El Rama in what is now the Región Autónoma del Atlántico Sur" should read more like
  • "The first known specimen was obtained by (field biologist/naturalist/business tycoon) W. G. Palmer on 5 November 1904 on the Río Escondido near the municipality of El Rama in what is now the Región Autónoma del Atlántico Sur." but remove extraneous information
• Bad sentence:
  • "This specimen, the holotype remains in the Natural History Museum, London, as specimen BM 5.3.4.2."
• I assume the "Colombian form [sic?]" is the Brown Cane Mouse - but this is never stated explicitly.
• define nomen nudum in sentence
• A and FA class articles are stylistically perfect - Taxonomy section needs more edits besides those listed in order to improve clarity and focus.
• in Ecology section, rm binomial for blue linked species in order to clean up text and keep reader focused - binomials should generally not be used outside of eponymous article unless there is no common name, or it is relevant to the article to discuss them. They tend to be distracting when constantly used in parantheses after a common name.

-ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 09:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Obvious question

A featured article which lacks a photo, and which fails to discuss the obvious question? Which is, of course, why a species known from only three specimens should be listed by IUCN as of "least concern". It may turn out to be true that it is more common than is apparent, but they don't know that for a fact. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

There are no appropriately licensed photographs as far as I know, and few photographs of any kind. The motivation for the IUCN's decision is already mentioned in the article. I'm not too familiar with the region, but I think it occurs in a sparsely populated and little-studied area, so there's little reason to believe it is threatened. Ucucha (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Nicaragua Canal

Does anyone know if the proposed Nicaragua Canal would affect the conservation status of O. dimidiatus? The canal is proposed to start on the Caribbean/Atlantic side, at Punta Gorda, which is right in the estimated range of the species. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzomalan (talk • contribs) 23:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oryzomys dimidiatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FA?

Not only is this only 15K, two sections only have one sentence. This should have its FA status removed.70.161.8.90 (talk) 16:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't know about length, if not much is known about a topic the summary will be short, but it probably should be reorganized to avoid one sentence sections. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A827:AEA3:FF17:B7C2 (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)