Talk:Orono, Maine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Orono, Maine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Maine Mid‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Demographics

This comment was left on the main article by an anon:

The DEMOGRAPHICS Section, line 1 contains incorrect, confusing, or ambiguous data: "9,112, 2,691 households". I assume what is intended is that the population is '9112' and there are '2691' households.

I'm not sure why that occured (demographic language is auto-added by a bot, but this article was vandalized a bit a few months ago). So I've gone ahead and manually fixed the language. --W.marsh 19:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

there are 2 different populations stated for the 2000 census: 9,112 and 9,114. the difference is minor to say the least, but one of them is wrong and it looks bad.Toyokuni3 (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Orono Maine seal.jpg

Image:Orono Maine seal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless accuracy

"Orono is located at about 44.8998 degrees latitude, -68.67444 degrees longitude." Since one degree is (roughly) 69 miles on average, an accuracy of 0.00001 degrees, as used in the longitude figure, is around 3.6 feet. If the figures really are that accurate, then there's no need for "about". If they're not, they shouldn't be quoted to such misleading accuracy. 86.132.140.45 (talk) 23:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Less facts more feeling?

It seems like this article could use a little more love. Percentages and locations are great, but have we actually learned anything about this town? Maybe more contributions on the fact that it is a small college town with lots of activity, a very arts oriented and interesting community?

--Nell Flynn (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orono, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150523034651/https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wider coverage map?

The map showing the location of Orono provides very little context to someone not already familiar with regions of Maine. Perhaps a statewide map as is more common on Wikipedia is more appropriate here and this image can be used elsewhere on the page. 2601:18B:300:1940:5C2D:4C3F:3F3F:9B18 (talk) 22:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. The map is useless to someone not familiar with the counties of Maine. 2601:18B:300:5780:B7E:4675:9F60:4CB0 (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]