Talk:Oric (computer)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rewrite notes
[edit]- Better organization
- No real lead section, too long and not a summary
- Get rid of nostalgia
- If we don't know something, let's not speculate on its unknown-ness.
- Other cleanup
- Don't direct the reader to outside website, turn it into a citation to a reference.
- What was "...which was not suitable for the market at that specific moment in time. supposed to mean?
- Peacock prose "entirely designed by..." etc. , speculation about arsonist.
WP:BOLD but notes to myself for a dull Sunday afternoon, if no-one beats me to it. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Chip
[edit]VIA 6522 or ACIA 6551? -- Polluks ★ 14:25, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- I concur. The 6522 is not an ACIA. It's a digital I/O device, not a serial one. With this in mind, I'm inclined to question the validity/accuracy of the entire paragraph. 92.135.10.210 (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Stratos
[edit]Is there any evidence that the Stratos was ever made or sold other than the unit shown at the show the day before OPI went under? Iv'e seen a number of Telestrats - I've never seen evidence of a Stratos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.145.104 (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
"Super reliable" tape interface?
[edit]How can it be deemed as super-reliable if there was allegedly a faulty error-check routine in ROM that would prevent programs to be loaded back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.55.62.246 (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- The tape section also says AII types of information may be saved such as programs - A I I ? Was this OCRed from a press release or something? 92.135.10.210 (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Undercutting Price By How Much?
[edit]"undercutting the price of the 48 KB version of the Spectrum by a few pounds"; how much by? £5, 10%, etc? Capturts (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Redirection
[edit]I expected OriC to be origin of replication, chromosomal, for bacteria. Could this be added as redirection notice? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- I found that a redirect from OriC did already exist, but I added it to the template at the top of this article. Good call, as many users would type all lower case when searching and could miss it. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)