Talk:Orgasm Inc.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Screenings

I watched this on Netflix; should I add that?

Seriously, how much utility is there to including this lengthy list of screenings?--NapoliRoma (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I WP:BRD reverted this edit because the screening section is not notable and should be removed per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. We do not need to keep a list of all screenings (some at small local theatres, colleges or non-notable film festivals) in addition to the 'Release' section where the most important screenings are covered in prose. Even if it could be referenced, which I doubt, it would give WP:UNDUE weight as the section takes up about four pages in the printed version compared to two pages for the rest of the content. jonkerz ♠talk 19:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on your points above. I would just add that it was my edit to reverse your edit. The reason was not clear for the removal of content at that point. Also small/minor pictures or movies when screened in certain locations actually makes it notable to add and is a part of making the picture worth reading about. May be a line that the movie has been screened in non commercial locations might help. Either way i am fine. Amit (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opening content

There seems to be a lot of content (i.e. an entire summary of the film) in the opening paragraphs. Surely some of this should be moved down into a "Summary" section? Also, I just watched the film earlier today, and parts of the description I found here do not accord in any way with how I understood the film. For example;

"Her employer is developing what they hope will be the first Viagra drug for women that wins FDA approval to treat a new disease: female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Many women suffer from this, as males suffers erectile dysfunctions. However, women's issues with this sexual matter has been seen to be not as important as their partner."

I don't remember anything from the documentary that compared the perceived importance of ED and FSD. In fact, most of the film attacked the very concept of FSD as being faulty.