Talk:Orbiting Carbon Observatory

A news item involving Orbiting Carbon Observatory was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 February 2009.

Wikipedia

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Access to project website may be restricted

The project's official website (listed first under External links) is giving me an HTTP 403 error. I cannot identify any technical problem on my end that is causing this. I am on the California Institute of Technology campus, but I have just had someone from my home confirm this problem too. It is likely that either access to the website is restricted to authorized JPL users/locations or there is a problem with the server.

I think this adversely affects the viability of the link as an external link or reference. What is the best way to deal with this? (Some kind of template tag?) 131.215.159.229 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I clicked today on the link you give above, I got a page staring with the text, "The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) is the latest Earth orbiting mission sponsored by...." If you didn't get that page, then it might have been some temporary trouble. As for your question, {{dead link}} might be a template you could use.... (sdsds - talk) 23:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. The website is working now. I had seen {{dead link}} used elsewhere but wasn't sure whether it was appropriate for the situation (and of course now it isn't). 131.215.159.229 (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Landed or crashed?

The lead says landed. Should it say crashed or something?--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Landed" is occuring within a quoted statement so we shouldn't change the wording there unless we want to remove the quoted statement entirely. Are primary reliable sources in agreement as to what to call this or are they in disagreement? Jon (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crashed is better.There will be sources ava. for it after some time.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

I switched it to crashed earlier. I found sources without difficulty. If you find any sources that describe it as "corkscrewing out of the sky", I think it would really juice up the article.--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.k then.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Any threat while crashing?

Did the rocket's re-entry into atmoshphere and subsequent crashing into some (uncontrolled) place imposed any threat for sometime ??What damage it could have caused on area it crashed.? If yes, should this be introduced into the article? 203.122.33.194 (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Maddy,India[reply]

Sabotage

Seems ripe for conspiracy theories. Many nations and industries would benefit (short term) from a lack of accurate global warming data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.43.65 (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OCO Re-direct

Note that OCO is a re-direct here. However, please note what Obama says is the term the War on Terror should be called?? Its initials are OCO, and does anyone think the abbreviation is common enough that it makes sense to remove the re-direct to make a dis-ambiguation page?? Georgia guy (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as I have no idea what you are talking about, I am inclined to say no. --G W… 21:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2

The mission repeat will be launched this summer: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. [1] Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, just under three months. At some point I'd suggest separating these into two pages, but there's no rush. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of creating 2 articles, and since the satellites/mission are identical, how about placing the incident in the History section and updating the Infobox with the future launch data? CHeers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are both distinct objects. It seems inappropriate to so completely marginalise the first one; it's not like it was a paper mission. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with that. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Orbiting_Carbon_Observatory_2#Merger. Thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 03:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orbiting Carbon Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/factsheet_department_nasa/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orbiting Carbon Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307191400/http://nasascience.nasa.gov/programs/earth-system-science-pathfinder to http://nasascience.nasa.gov/programs/earth-system-science-pathfinder

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Faulty Aluminum

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough.

I read in the news today that the U.S. Justice Department entered an agreement with the company that made the fairings to pay restitution for test result fraud. see https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/aluminum-extrusion-manufacturer-agrees-pay-over-46-million-defrauding-customers-including

Since I work for Northrop Grumman, which now owns Orbital, I don't want to make the edit myself. (I don't have anything to do with that part of the business, but still feels like a COI to me.) I think this info should be included in the "Original Launch" section to explain the fairing failure. Psu256 (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 2-MAY-2019

Unable to review

To expedite your request, please provide the desired claim in the form of a verbatim statement which can then be added to the article (if approved) by the reviewer. The exact location where the desired claim is to be placed should also be described, as shown in the example below.

Edit request example
*Please add the following claim, as the third sentence of the second paragraph of the Sun* section: "The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 864,337 miles in length." Using as the reference*: "Harinath, Paramjit (2019). The Sun*. Academic Press. p. 1."

Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed with the verbatim text and the placement location.
Regards, Spintendo 08:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Ok, let's try this again. (As an engineer, reading about engineering failures is an interest of mine.) Please add, at the end of the "Original Launch" section:

On 23 April 2019, the U.S. Justice Department announced that a settlement had been reached with the manufacturer of the faulty fairings. It was revealed that the company, Sapa Profiles Inc., had falsified test records over the course of many years (1996-2015). In 2017, a testing lab supervisor was sentenced to three years in prison and a $170000 fine for his role in the falsifications. ^[1]^[2]^[3]

Psu256 (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Reply 2-MAY-2019

Edit request implemented Spintendo 16:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/aluminum-extrusion-manufacturer-agrees-pay-over-46-million-defrauding-customers-including

[2] ttp://fortune.com/2019/05/01/nasa-mission-failures-aluminum-scam/

[3] ttps://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-investigation-uncovers-cause-of-two-science-mission-launch-failures/

[1]

[2]

[3]