Talk:Orange-headed tanager/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Reading soon. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- upperparts – not explained in linked article, link to Birdgloss instead?
- Replaced all links to upperparts and underparts with birdgloss.
- No this does not work, you need to use the template as explained in Talk:Glossary of bird terms. And there is still one link to the anatomy article left (that still does not work). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Added the links, using the bird gloss template this time.
- No this does not work, you need to use the template as explained in Talk:Glossary of bird terms. And there is still one link to the anatomy article left (that still does not work). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Replaced all links to upperparts and underparts with birdgloss.
- Females are similar, but are duller. – Maybe "Femals are similar but duller"?
- Done.
- generic name – link
- Reworded instead, no good target.
- Rewording is ok, maybe even better, but you could have used Generic name (biology). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reworded instead, no good target.
- In the main text you link some country names but not others (e.g., Bolivia, Brazil)
- Per MOS:OVERLINKING, I've tried to avoid linking countries that everybody is likely to know (Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela), but linked the rest.
- It's a minor thing and completely your call, but I'm confused that "Venezuela" is more well-known than, e.g., "Peru"? My intuition would be the other way around. Not being consistent here has slightly confused me. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well, imo, Venezuela is pretty well-known due to its status as a major oil producer, as well as its economic crisis. The other countries are very well-known outside of the Americas. It isn't a big deal, I could link Venezuela as well if you want.
- It's a minor thing and completely your call, but I'm confused that "Venezuela" is more well-known than, e.g., "Peru"? My intuition would be the other way around. Not being consistent here has slightly confused me. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per MOS:OVERLINKING, I've tried to avoid linking countries that everybody is likely to know (Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela), but linked the rest.
- less extensive yellow on the head, – Do you possibly mean "intensive", or is the yellow area indeed smaller in females?
- Extensive is correct.
- Do you know if the shown photographs show males or females?
- No.
- nest about 2 m (6.6 ft) after the ground. – "over"?
- Replaced with above.
- What about vocalisations? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Completely forgot about that, added now. AryKun (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- The taxonbox mentions "Nemosia chrysopis" as a synonym, but not the main text. Mention that the subspecies was once considered a species of its own? Also, this name needs a redirect.
- Created redirects, and added bit to subspecies section.
- Link "crowns" (to birdgloss?) --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done. AryKun (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Closing note: Thanks for the fixes, looks all good now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)