This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Hello. Someone appears to have vandalized the graph for the page. Yesterday, the graph depicted National Unity with a large lead. Now Likuid is in the lead and quite a large one. Only a single polling firm has ever depicted Likuid in the lead and something is very wrong. I ask that the graph be fixed immediately, since this appears to be an act of vandalism. (2607:FEA8:7221:F600:C4A9:2DB8:3BB0:3D12 (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]
The user changed the graph drastically in response to a polling firm that is the only one that has depicted Likuid leading at all in any situations, everything else depicts National Unity winning. And given that this poll is created by a channel that is overwhelming for Israeli conservatism, it cannot be considered fair and impartial. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Channel_14_(Israel) I ask that the graph be immediately put back to its April revision since the new one does not reflect reality. (2607:FEA8:7221:F600:C4A9:2DB8:3BB0:3D12 (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Hello, indeed it is. The poll was posted with only the scenario poll attached. Since there have been similar scenario polls stylized in the same way, that is how I chose to do it as well. Sutapurachina (talk) 22:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]