Talk:Opinion polling for the 2019 Polish parliamentary election

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2016. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United Left

The United Left was dissolved over a year ago. Why is it still featured on the table? Charles Essie (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It refers to older polls (last included in February 2016). Most polls simply ask about SLD now. Mélencron (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Razem.jpg (discussion)
SLD.jpg (discussion)

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

PiS Teillogo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Platforma Obywatelska Teillogo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Partia Razem.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej Teillogo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Wolność (political party).svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Scenarios' section

Given that

the electoral campaign has already begun,
coalitions are no longer fiction (like the Civic Coalition and the Polish Coalition),

we shouldn't describe the latest polls as being 'scenarios'.

In fact, we do not need this section at all. The previous articles about opinion polling in Poland (listed on Template:Opinion_polling_for_Polish_elections) have no such section at all and use Template:efn (footnotes) or cell mergers to describe scenarios.

It would make sense to have a special section if the scenario surveyed was outlandish ; however, I see no poll that fits that category.

I can do the editing and spread the "scenario" polls throughout the years 2015–2019.

The advantage is that polls will be easier to compare with 'regular' polls (especially when the same poll offered the same sample the various scenarios).

I see no drawback.

If nobody disagrees, I'll go on with the change.

Kahlores (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYNTH averages

218.155.136.167, as done under a different IP label at Opinion polling for the 2019 Portuguese legislative election, has been adding entirely synthesis material in opinion polling articles by introducing a reportedly "GEUN/GEHSC" polling average, which as shown by the sources provided is a manual calculation of cherry-picked data which no reliable source backs. I see it appropiate to notice this on this talk page in order for users to be cautious when seeing these "averages", because they are entirely original research. It looks like this user is seeking to use Wikipedia polling articles as a mean to promote themselves or their own data calculations as if they were actually encyclopedic, when they aren't. Impru20^talk 12:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]