This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I put here this message that I published on Impru20's talkpage:
I explained that People's Coalition was comprised at a national level of AP, PDP and PL, not only AP. You said that "the other parties are not required here", but under what reason you say that? The thing that the AP was the major party doesn't represent the fact that the other two parties were also presenting candidates at all constituencies (even more, you could take a look at the paper ballots and posters from that year, and clearly do represent all three party logos, like this, this and this, because that was the coalition logo [a combination of the three logos]). I hope that this could clarify the aspect of having the logos on the tables. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It has been already explained. Logo used is that of AP because it was the Coalition's main party and because there is no logo for the Coalition itself, but the link used is not that for AP, but that for the People's Coalition, that includes all three parties (AP, PDP and PL), and even regional parties that did contest the election within the Coalition (UPN). It'd be redundant to list the links for the other two parties separately when there's already a link to the Coalition article itself (and given that a link to AP's article is not shown). Thus, it has no sense to list the other two parties because there's already a link redirecting to the an article which includes all three parties. I agree on the logo issue, but so far there isn't a logo for CP to be found in the Commons (at least that I've found). I'll no issue, however, if you go and find a suitable logo for CP.
It is simple. There is a single article for the People's Coalition, as the member parties did not contest the election separately but within a single, national list. And the Coalition was, indeed, intended as a permanent electoral alliance (being the precursor to the current PP). The example put for Podemos is not the same. En Marea, Compromís-Podemos and En Comú Podem have their results shown separately from Podemos' main list at the national level, and did run their own candidates (only that later, for simplicity, the aggregated results for all of them are shown, also mirroring what reliable sources and the media do). That is why for 2015 the logos for the three regional coalitions are also shown. As well as because some opinion polls did show results for those separately (another difference with CP). It's not the same case. The only issue, in any case, would be the logo used, which is that of AP (due to an absense of a CP logo). I've no issue if someones goes and finds a suitable logo for CP. Impru20 (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
