Jump to content

Talk:Operation Whirlwind/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • planned, supported and executed at operational group and unit level "at operational group and unit level" is redundant, especially considering the beginning of the next paragraph.
    • Removed.
  • Delete "the": secure the Papuk Mountain and in the Operation Otkos 10
    • Done.
  • Don't capitalize unless it has a name or number: Armoured-mechanised conversely, capitalize this 592nd and the 622nd mechanised brigades
    • Done.
  • This is awkward: change of the commander did not produce any results in terms of use of the unit in the offensive
    • Reworded - Could you please have another look at it?
  • "The" command post Command post of the 102nd
    • Added.
  • Awkward: last remaining tank blown up using explosives to prevent its capture.
    • Reworded - Hopefully new structure makes more sense.
  • Images appropriately licensed.
  • No overlinks, one circular DAB that needs to be fixed, and one external link that timed out.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The toolserver might be acting up a bit here. I also get the DAB Links result that the article contains a link to "Operation Vihor" which points back at the same article - only it does not. I even tried searching for word "vihor" in edit mode to find that link but there is none.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rechecked again, this time via "what links here" function at the redirect page - and the results included not only the Operation Whirlwind but also a wide array of other Croatian-battles-related pages. I suspect a couple of navboxes are the culprits, and I modified them accordingly. I think DABlinks needs a while to register the changes to the navboxes, but I hope that will resolve the issue.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I'll try to address your concerns with this article immediately.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]