Jump to content

Talk:Operation Steel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Casualties

[edit]

where are the sources? That source is in all the pages and thee is no link to it. In the mean time I am going to delete the total casualties until a proper source is put up! Also please translate too and post 2 one source may be biased toward Turkey or the PKK(129.21.71.50 (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]


Result

[edit]

Unsuccessfull? 550 terorists killed despite 64 loses. It is more than a success... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.240.84.23 (talk) 23:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tak Flag.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Tak Flag.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tak Flag.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish casualties

[edit]

They are fully verified. --Mttll (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a source. --Mttll (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the operation

[edit]

According to sources operation did not succeed. If you change operations result to the "Decisive Turkish victory", please provide a reliable source.

List of sources that support the fact that operation didn't succeed:[1]
Ferakp (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source that supports the operation didn't succeed and it was PKK victory. [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferakp (talkcontribs) 15:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a wester/pkk biased source. Like I said many times, I'm talking and citing turkish sourced claims/facts. Gala19000 (talk) 15:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where they say it is PKK source? The book uses source 31 and it is KRG source. KRG is Kurdistan Regional Government. Read the source again. Reverse your changes!Ferakp (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

on result of the operation and casualties

[edit]

How come a full research done by a 2 universities is unreliable, yet some terrorists', who had lost this operation and couldn't conduct any more insurgency in the region for the next 3 years, claims are reliable? Idk what to tell you man, The quote from the https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=EOZjCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA328&redir_esc=y is referring to the entirety of the PKK, The operations main concept was to eliminate pkk members in the border and to disable them from raiding border stations. Turkey was successful in destroying the camps in the region and blowing out many many caves. Therefore, stating as if the operations intention was to completely annihilate PKK, and that they failed to do that, its just completely false. TRAVERA1 (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]