Talk:Operation Rah-e-Nijat

A news item involving Operation Rah-e-Nijat was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 October 2009.

Wikipedia

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Integrist

Can we better define the word "integrist" on this page? The attached link refers to the Papacy and the French Revolution - hardly what I think the Islamic militants are. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map needs to be updated

I will updated the map if I find a wiki compatible liced map. --yousaf465' 07:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beligerents

Why include the US as a beligerent? 124.171.219.128 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because they have shot drones into the warzone killing Taliban militants, as part of the greater "War on Terror". Jolly Ω Janner 10:35, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Start of Operation

there's probably a good reason that i'm not seeing for omiting this information, but shouldnt the infobox for this page display the start date of the start of the Pakistani ground operation in addition to the date when the operation formally commenced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.60.56 (talk) 22:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Date

This article appears to have been written at the start of operations, and not updated since. Seeing as it has been two years, we could probably afford to update the text-changing the future tense to past, including info on how effective the offensive was, rather than how effective it was predicted to be, etc. I'm also going to fix references to Osama bin Laden possibly being in South Waziristan, since recent events have proven this assumption false. The article will now make references to the fact that it was believed at the time that OBL was in the region. Dpenn89 (talk) 06:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Concerns

I noticed that most of the first section appears copy-pasted from the TIME article listed as a reference. This is copyrighted material, and should be reworded to avoid complications.

Second, I did some cleanup work on the rest of the article, making it reflect something that has already happened, and eliminating the POV use of the word "martyred" to describe fallen soldiers. This eliminates a possibly contentions wording on a matter of faith, and simplifies the article's sentence structure.

I see room for updating this article with more recent reporting on the outcome of operations-surely some more progress has been made since last October? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpenn89 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091018170817/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/20091017/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091017/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Operation Rah-e-Nijat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent units/ incorrect order of battle

Some units, such as the "50th Airborne division" and "10th Special Forces Battalion", do not exist and aren't name in any of the sources mentioned. They should be removed. 2A02:C7C:D45B:2C00:E0FE:1B55:E727:88AF (talk) 03:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]