Jump to content

Talk:Operation Paula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOperation Paula has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 30, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
September 21, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Start

[edit]

Page under construction. Dapi89 (talk) 12:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Paula/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):  Done I think. Dapi89 (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Comments

[edit]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay great. Dapi89 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Jim, to be honest. I've always used this site to check French units and Orbats and I have never had cause to regret that. On the website in the citation, if you scroll down to the bottom, the editors/site admins have added a bibliography. They have cited their sources, so I trust them. Dapi89 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add, I also used it 'cause I had nothing on the French side in my books. Only hints, but never a complete picture of their OB. Dapi89 (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]