This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
Any objections to moving this to Operation Model 5? I believe the English name is more appropriate. However, if someone opposes using the English name in principle, the second best would be Operation Dugman 5 per WP:HE. —Ynhockey(Talk)21:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Operation Dugman" is fine, but I really dislike the name "Operation Model 5". "Model" is too generic, it has too many meanings, unlike the Hebrew counterpart. No one's ever going to guess what type of model "Doogman" refers to. Besides, most literature refers to the event as "Doogman" or "Dugman" anyway. Poliocretes (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, I moved the article but forgot that this discussion ever took place. Feel free to move back if you wish, but we should revisit the discussion—I believe that the name Doogman 5 is meaningless to English-speakers, so it shouldn't be used as a title. In the article itself, we can list the Hebrew name anyway. However, if in most literature the Hebrew name is used, then we should use it. However, I prefer Dugman over Doogman. —Ynhockey(Talk)14:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article currently states that 5 of the two seat F-4 Phantom aircraft were lost and another was damaged but returned to Ramat David, while there were 2 KIA and 9 POW. Was one of the KIA in the damaged aircraft? -- 119.31.121.88 (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
