Jump to content

Talk:Operation Ladbroke/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First impression
  • Well-written article. No major issues.

Lead
  • Good lead – informative, summarises article. No action required.
Background
  • No action required.
Planing
  • No action required.
Images, references and external links
  • Please add alt text to images.
It's not a requirement for GA or even FA
  • Add years of publication next to author's last name eg. Warren 1955, p. 21.
Done
  • "London, United Kingdom: Kimber." no need to mention the UK, as London is well-known. If you insist, shorten it to UK.
Done Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
End note

I find the article very informative and well-written. I find it really hard to find any flaws and mistakes. Very confident this article will be promoted to FA status. I'll be there for the FAC. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 07:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]