Talk:Operation Elster

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Elster article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Espionage Mid‑importance

	Operation Elster is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Intelligence / European / German / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of the landing site be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Maine may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Old newsreel

FBI film footage taken of Colepaugh and Gimpel is contained in an (unfortunately licensed) old newsreel from 1945. A cool bit of WP:OR: at timestamp 01:42:39 in the newsreel the radio they were captured with is visible. It is an exact match for a 1935 General Electric model A-83, seen here, which corroborates their story of buying a used broadcast radio with a shortwave band on it. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question about sentencing

If Colepaugh betrayed Gimpel, then why did he serve the longer sentence? That seems odd, would be good if the article explained that.. Mujinga (talk) 03:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, the sources don’t discuss that aspect. I could guess that someone who betrayed their own country was treated harsher than an enemy combatant who was captured performing their duty. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually in reviewing the text and sources, I see that both were tried and sentenced to death, so no disparity there. The death sentences were later commuted, and both were paroled within 5 years of each other. Parole decisions are not part of criminal sentencing, they are made by a board of people appointed to review prisoners records and make evaluations and recommendations. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

This page was moved without discussion in March 2015, with the edit summary it's either "Unternehmen Elster" or "Operation Magpie".
On the contrary, the format "Operation Elster" is entirely normal in English: it is common for writers to refer to foreign military operations by their native name while using the English term 'Operation' (eg. Operation Bodenplatte, Operation Gladio, Operation Ten-Go) or by a translation of the non-English name (eg. Operation Sealion). It is not at all usual to use a non-English term (like unternehmen) when there is a perfectly good equivalent in English, and in this case it is contrary to our requirement to use English and is not consistent with other similar articles.
So it has been moved back (with my thanks) via the WP:RM#Undiscussed Moves facility. Xyl 54 (talk) 13:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, good move, thanks. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Failed due to betrayal edit.

This has been reverted more than once.

If you wish to add this then add an apprpropriate citation with the additional information and all will be well. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]