The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
The Cradle is red at WP:RSP and should not be used here. I don't want to hack away at somebody's new article, but whatever can't be sourced to something other than The Cradle should be removed from the article. Levivich (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following source errors are present in the current article and I will be cleaning up next week if there is not validation to the following issues.
The middle east monitor is considered an unreliable source as per WP:RSP
the New Arab source used exclusively is just repeating the Haaretz source, these should be consolidated
the bibliography can and should be added to the references rather than using the current format
Sources are incomplete, for instance the Maya Wind source should mention her publisher Verso Books
Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies is the current name of Holy Land studies and should be updated to reflect this
For the sake of balance in the article the well poisoning antisemitism trope page should be linked to here along with the citations there about Abbas admitting to fabricating the narrative that wells were being poisoned. Bgrus22 (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Several of the above have now been implemented, we still need to accomplish the following:
the bibliography can and should be added to the references rather than using the current format
the well poisoning antisemitism trope page should be linked to here
the citations about Abbas admitting to fabricating the narrative that wells were being poisoned should be added here as well
considering this topic I think we should format the article more akin to similar pages like U.S. Army Field Manual 30-31B, Strategy of tension, and potentially the Gladio stuff in general all examples of supposed clandestine operations with some confirmation but a lack of government acknowledgement of the overall circumstances. This should be kept as a purported operation at the risk of the page taking a side on an ongoing unresolved topic.
