Jump to content

Talk:2008 Mumbai attacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article2008 Mumbai attacks was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 29, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 16, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 6, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
November 18, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
September 3, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 26, 2008.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 26, 2009, November 26, 2011, November 26, 2013, November 26, 2014, November 26, 2018, and November 26, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article



User:User:MiszaBot/configUser:User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

Bibliography

[edit]

User:User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil

[edit]

the featured image should be changed to something more iconic than a map, like the Taj on fire GoatLord234 (talk) 13:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

islamic terrorism?

[edit]

isn't that quite a racist motive to say i know the nature of the attacks is truly unforgivable and inhumane but if you are going to blame a religion for the terrorist attack, that is a new low. 2406:3003:2002:2D79:D93A:C16E:D2E1:4F6 (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

look at the 2006 mumbai attacks it is also done by extremists but the motive is just terrorism, meanwhile the 2008 mumbai attacks is classified as islamic terrorism. quite islamophobic it's disgraceful to disrespect a religion 218.212.64.8 (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The attacks were of course conducted by a militant group who were denounced and criticized by all religions alike. Since the attacks were not supported by the religion in any way, such comments are truly unnecessary. Edits have been made to remove the religious involvements in the attack. If you still feel that any of the lines in the article disturbs the religious sentiments, please reply. Milan Zacria (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2008 Mumbai attacks/1

Add A Fact: "Mujahideen Hyderabad Deccan false claim"

[edit]

I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below

Amid speculation regarding the identity of the terrorists, an unknown group calling itself Mujahideen Hyderabad Deccan claimed responsibility for the attacks in an e-mail; however, the e-mail was later traced to a computer in Pakistan, and it became obvious that no such group existed.

The fact comes from the following source:

https://www.britannica.com/event/Mumbai-terrorist-attacks-of-2008

Here is a wikitext snippet to use as a reference:

 {{Cite web |title=Mumbai terrorist attacks of 2008 {{!}} Events, Death Toll, & Facts {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Mumbai-terrorist-attacks-of-2008 |website=www.britannica.com |date=2024-09-11 |access-date=2024-10-03 |language=en |quote=Amid speculation regarding the identity of the terrorists, an unknown group calling itself Mujahideen Hyderabad Deccan claimed responsibility for the attacks in an e-mail; however, the e-mail was later traced to a computer in Pakistan, and it became obvious that no such group existed.}} 

Additional comments from user: This should be added too right

This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.

Milan Zacria (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]