Talk:Open admissions
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Are you kidding me?
In many ways, Open Admissions was doomed to failure, as sad as that is to say.
Unreal. Please, someone clean this up.140.180.149.219 18:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no move. No evidence provided to support move request. JPG-GR (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support - as nominator. It is supposed to be open admission.
- Oppose. This page shows both CUNY's usage and the New York Times':Open admissions. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.