Talk:OpenText Quality Center

This page was proposed for deletion by 90.174.3.8 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
Not notable. There are no independent sources
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2020-10-23 with the comment:
Consider merge to Micro Focus as WP:ATD

Advertising?

User:R'n'B marked this entry as advertising. I cannot agree. IMO it is a neat and short description of what a product from a large supplier (HP) is supposed to do. Nothing wrong with that! The text is objective, a link to the state of North Carolina (yes you find a HP issued datasheet there) is for me independent enough as a reference. so I removed the tag JanEnEm (talk) 10:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a few days to work on this.I agree with JanEnEm that this is a short description of a product line for a large supplier, but we can get outside references and review and make more neutral. Please do not delete for at least one week. JLRedperson (talk) 19:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutely advertising. It calls Quality Centre web-based, which it's NOT. It does not speak to any of the well-known and well-attested quality issues with this application not limited to major stability problems, performance and resource usage. A page which is entirely one-sided in favor of a low-quality product like QC is clearly advertising. Sean.hederman (talk) 19:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the refernce to QC Reporting, looks to me as if the product does not exist any more Nerdyengineer (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on HP Quality Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]