Talk:Open-pool Australian lightwater reactor

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Open-pool Australian lightwater reactor is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Added redirection link to OPAL (software) --JakeParker 18:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instruments

Wikipedia is not a web host and as such does not need a page for every single instrument at OPAL. The facility itself is notable for sure, but the individual instruments are not. I suggest instead that a reference to the instrument pages on the OPAL website should be given in the current section Neutron scattering at OPAL instead of creating pages on wikipedia about these instruments. Polyamorph (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accidents and investigation

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/09/3134526.htm?section=justin According to the ABC this reactor seems to have had a number of accidents including the contamination of a staff member. By Australian standards for Nuclear Safety I would argue this is noteable.--Senor Freebie (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]