Talk:Ontraport
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I am very new to this, so if I am violating any standards let me know. I have been researching this company and decided to check to see if there was a Wikipedia article on them. I have no idea who started this article, but it there seem to be some references that are not accurate. I do not intend to edit nor add to the information presented, but my experience is that the company is a sham. Numerous attempts to contact Ontraport have gone unanswered and I receive daily spam referencing the company. A complaint to the BBB was made and it too went unanswered. 2605:E000:AA84:5100:9DC4:2135:B44E:AB96 (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I am pretty new too. This seems like a press release, and they also run a conference that seems spammy too. Dsbinla (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Proposed changes
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Edit #1: Overview
- Specific text to be removed: Forbes named Ontraport No. 71 on its list of "America's Most Promising Companies."[11] The company also placed No. 10 on Inc.'s "Top 100 Software Companies" and No. 26 on its "Top 100 California Companies.".[12][13] Ontraport has clients all over the globe.[14]
- Reason for the change: This text makes Ontraport's Wikipedia page look biased and triggered the conflict of interest flag.
- References supporting change: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
Lsk2016 (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Edit #2: History Done
- Specific text to be removed: In 2012 a three-year sales growth of 3001%, landed Ontraport on Inc. 500's list of America's Fastest Growing Private Companies.[1][18]
- Reason for the change: This text makes Ontraport's Wikipedia page look biased and triggered the conflict of interest flag.
- References supporting change: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
Lsk2016 (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Edit #3: Sidebar Done
- Specific text to be removed: Change "Ontraport!!!!" to "Ontraport"
- Reason for the change: This text makes Ontraport's Wikipedia page look biased and triggered the conflict of interest flag.
- References supporting change: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
Lsk2016 (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Edit #4: Software and Services Done with edits for a neutral tone. The list of features was condensed to what I could find via the provided source. Thanks Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Specific text to be swapped: REPLACE* Specific text to be removed: Ontraport offers a subscription-based sales and marketing software for small businesses and entrepreneurs. Features include business automation, campaign builder, CRM, ecommerce, email marketing, SMS and postcards, landing pages, marketing automation, marketing tracking, membership sites, metrics dashboard, partner program and sales force automation.[27] All of the tools are centered around the visual campaign builder launched in 2017.[11] WITH THIS TEXT: Ontraport is an all-in-one business software that offers service businesses a full set of marketing, sales and business operations features including CRM, automation, payments, sales pipeline, web apps, tracking, email and SMS, landing pages, membership sites and more.
- Reason for the change: The features listed on the current page are outdated.
- References supporting change: https://ontraport.com
Edit #5: References Not done. I consolidated information and removed the COI tag. Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Specific text to be removed: ALL CURRENT REFERENCES. PLEASE REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING: [1]
- Reason for the change: This text makes Ontraport's Wikipedia page look biased and triggered the conflict of interest flag.
- References supporting change: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
Lsk2016 (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Took care of #2 and #3, easy no-brainers. Retswerb (talk) 05:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
References