Talk:Ontology alignment

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics

Where does this belong?

This has been listed as being part of WikiProject:Philosophy, but that seems misguided. The emphasis in the article is on the computing aspect. So maybe it is more at home in WikiProject:Databases or WikiProject:Computer Science. Since I have never done anything in the WikiProject space I am disinclined to add it to those; I am not sure what the acceptable protocol is for that. Doctorambient (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notation

In the section "Computer Science/Formal Definition" there is a lot of notation introduced that is never defined. It also appears to not be used for much of the discussion. If someone can expand the section with proper definitions and such, that might be a good fix. If not, I will likely re-write the section removing the notation entirely after a little while. Doctorambient (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the the information according to Euzenat and Shvaiko's latest text book on Ontology Matching. I think we should keep the formal definition in the article despite it is not yet "used" much. --Janothan Parker (talk) 08:27, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ontology alignment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120213104823/http://www.polibear.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/orsi-xsomflexmap.pdf to http://www.polibear.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/orsi-xsomflexmap.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]